SafeBLAST (BLAST) Platform is Different
Some members in the community get offended when I say no posting of specific price “GUARANTEE” is allowed on telegram, especially without using disclaimers like NFA or DYOR. The SEC’s case against Safemoon is a clear example of how low the agency is willing to go to build a case by buffering it up with casual social media quotes, which should otherwise be ignored. I still don’t agree that the SEC has jurisdiction on many crypto claims, however, bad actors give the agency more weapons to use against crypto and create narratives to sway public opinion in its favor.
The Safemoon case also shows how unique SafeBLAST is in comparison to some other projects. Many have said we are the same as Safemoon. However, the key parts of the lawsuit show a big night and day contrast, which also makes the citations on the SafeBLAST legal opinion document, much stronger than ever.
COMPARE / CONTRAST
1. Raised funds, which may or may not require “registration” to launch the initial Liquidity Pool.
Safemoon — YES
SafeBLAST — NO
2. Team have complete access to the 5% Generated Liquidity Pool from the protocol.
Safemoon — YES
SafeBLAST — NO
3. Blockchain evidence that the team controlled the majority of the total supply. Performed a manipulative pump (bait) to dump and create Version2 contract (switch).
Safemoon — YES
SafeBLAST — NO
4. Evidence of removing hundreds of millions of dollars from the Generated Liquidity Pool on multiple occasions without notifying the community about their private access and/or the repeated removal of such LP.
Safemoon — YES
SafeBLAST — NO
5. Formal Team members with a unique financial benefit from the buying/selling/transfers of the token and smart contract, which other members of the community did not have.
Safemoon — YES
SafeBLAST — NO
6. Dedicated members of the community make up the “Team” as unpaid volunteers with NO access to the Generated Liquidity Pool for life.
Safemoon — NO
SafeBLAST — YES
Here at SafeBLAST, we may be a relatively small project, but we have room to grow as we continue to build. Sometimes people make unintentional mistakes due to lack of knowledge or otherwise. But a deliberate and consistent act of fraud is not a mistake, which is what we do our very best to stay away from at all costs. We may not be a flashy community like some projects who pay themselves with your hard-earned money, but we are committed to the growth of the entire ecosystem.
I personally came into the project building part of the crypto industry without any knowledge and quickly realized how vastly different it is from just buying, selling and/or holding crypto. I’m old enough to know the difference between fraudulent activities and a mistake that can be fixed. Even when there were things I didn’t know, I asked questions, and I started learning as much as I could as fast as possible. Each night for the past 2yrs, I’ve spent a minimum of 2 to 3 hours just learning and I’m still learning. I don’t believe Safemoon team loading up on excessive amounts from V1 Generated LP and then deciding to create V2, was a move to fix a mistake. I think the repeated act caused unfathomable losses for the victimized Safemoon community members and they deserve restitution.
Besides getting scammed multiple times, most people do not know that I also personally lost a lot of money to many ICO rug pulls in a span of 3months during the ICO/ILO/IDO/PRESALE boom. This is why I started trusting less and verifying more by doing my own research. I stopped listening to hype from people, including friends and family members, and focused on my own research. This way I can prevent as many losses as possible and mostly have myself to blame when things go wrong with my investments.
My painful crypto loss journey is also the main reason the SafeBLAST project was launched with no ICO along with an ownership renounced contract. I told the smart contract developer what the goal was, which includes preventing contract manipulation, etc. Anything that puts the power or control of a smart contract of a payment token in the hands of anyone, was a COMPLETE NO for me. I needed peace of mind especially with a liquidity generation protocol; I believed there were others out there who felt the same way, and we have the like-minded team members to prove it.
This is what the SafeBLAST Community stands for and is all about. The active community members along with the volunteer team who have been doing whatever it takes every day to keep things moving in the right direction, deserves your gratitude and appreciation. We will welcome anyone who wants to join our community with open arms. Bring your positive vibes and leave the FUD behind. We all should focus on growing the adoption of the BLAST token and let the chips fall where they may. SafeBLAST for Life.
